When it comes to formalising family law property matters, there are two primary mechanisms to consider: consent orders and financial agreements. Each option has its own advantages and disadvantages, and it's important to understand these factors before making a decision. In this blog post, we will explore the key features of both consent orders and financial agreements, and discuss how a hybrid approach can be beneficial for separating couples.
Consent Orders
Consent orders are court-approved documents that provide a robust and enforceable framework for separating couples. Here are the advantages and disadvantages of using consent orders:
Advantages:
Once approved by the court, consent orders become official court documents, ensuring their enforceability.
Parties in simple matters can utilise consent orders without substantial expenses, especially with the availability of online resources like National Legal Aid's Amica platform.
Seeking enforcement orders for consent orders is generally considered more straightforward compared to financial agreements.
Disadvantages:
Crafting certain consent orders, particularly that of a complicated nature, may require a thorough understanding of legal nuances and factual considerations, making professional guidance advisable.
Consent orders primarily address property division and related matters, leaving out provisions for spouse maintenance and other unique or supplementary issues.
Consent orders are typically made after separation and cannot be entered into before or during the relationship, except in unusual circumstances.
Financial Agreements
Financial agreements offer flexibility and autonomy for separating couples, allowing them to tailor terms according to their specific needs.
Advantages:
Financial agreements allow parties to customise their arrangements without the stringent requirements and oversight of the court, preserving privacy and flexibility.
The involvement of third parties is slightly easier, facilitating unique arrangements such as family members providing loans or securities.
Particularly in pre-nuptial agreements, financial agreements provide a proactive approach to asset protection and offer a level of certainty in the event of a relationship breakdown.
Disadvantages:
All parties to a financial agreement must obtain independent legal advice, which can increase the costs involved.
Financial agreements are subject to discretionary enforcement, often requiring court intervention to validate and uphold their terms.
The criteria for setting aside financial agreements require parties to meet high thresholds of proof, potentially complicating the resolution process and prolonging legal proceedings.
For separating couples, a hybrid approach combining consent orders and financial agreements can be an effective solution. This strategy allows for the benefits of both options to be utilised. For example, consent orders for property division as they offer judicial approval and straightforward enforceability and a financial agreement for supplementary issues such as spouse maintenance.
When deciding on the optimal approach to formalise family law property matters, it is crucial to consider the unique circumstances, assets, and objectives of the parties involved. By understanding the advantages and disadvantages of consent orders and financial agreements, couples can make informed decisions that best suit their needs. Seeking professional legal advice is highly recommended to navigate the complexities of family law and ensure the best possible outcome.
Remember, every case is unique, and it's important to consult with a family lawyer to determine the most suitable approach for your specific situation.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please feel free to reach out. We are here to help!
Comments